No Title.Columbus, Ohio, State Journal [Republican](2 June 1856)
The committee on Federal Relations in the
Connecticut Legislature, recently reported the
following resolutions for the consideration of
the two Houses of the General Assembly, viz.:
Whereas, A Senator of the United States has
been assailed by brutal and cowardly violence
on the floor of the Senate Chamber, in the
National Capitol, and gross injuries inflicted upon
his person, avowedly as a punishment for words
spoken in the ordinary course of debate; therefore--.
Resolved by this Assembly, That the outrage
thus committed is at once a crime against law,
a flagrant violation of the Constitution, a breach
of the privileges of Congress, and a disgrace to
the national reputation.
Resolved,
That the perpetrator thereof should
immediately be expelled from his seat in the
House of Representatives in the present
Congress, and the Members thereof from this
State are requested to use their most earnest
efforts to accomplish that result.
Resolved,
That on this occasion Connecticut
sends to Massachusetts fraternal greeting. As
our fathers stood side by side at Bunker's Hill,
when the great conflict for civil and political
liberty began, so will their sons stand in the
assertion and defence of freedom for thought
and speech.
Resolved,
That his Excellency the Governor,
be requested to transmit immediately a copy of
the foregoing preamble and resolutions to the
Governor of Massachusetts, to be laid before the
Legislature of that State, now in session, and a
like copy to each of our Senators and
Representatives in Congress.
The consideration of these resolutions first
came up in the Senate, and were adopted with
only one dissenting voice against them. In the
mean time, before being called up in the House,
the Slave Democracy held a caucus and determined
on opposition. After a debate of great
spirit and power on the part of the American
Republicans, and of trembling subserviency on
the part of the Doughfaces, they were brought
to a vote and passed -- 116 to 90 -- every supporter
of the Administration voting in the negative!
All right for Old Connecticut. There were
tories there during the war of the Revolution,
who aided in burning her towns, murdering her
citizens, and upholding generally the power of
the oppressor. There were Blue-light Federalists
in Connecticut during the war of 1812.
And why not Doughfaces of '56, sympathising
with the Aristocracy of the South and the
Border Ruffians of the West? Now, as then, New
England will assert her devotion to Popular
Rights.
[<<Previous Editorial][Next Editorial>>]
|